I've just read the following article. It says:
"Apparently, the Famous Five and Secret Seven made the police look
like buffoons, Noddy's sexuality was questionable, Golliwog was racist
and making fun of Big Ears was insulting to people with big ears," she
said. "After the meeting I told her that I had got a lot of pleasure from Enid Blyton's books, and she said 'Well, your literary tastes leave a lot to be desired'.
The literary tastes of a large percentage of people leave a lot to be desired then (including myself).
Presumably it can't be because the stories are allegedly racist etc
that it reflects badly on people if they enjoyed them? I knew nothing
about that sort of stuff as a child. I'm guessing the stories are
considered to be shallow? I wonder what children's books she considered
to be superior? When I was 7 I wanted to read about magic trees with
weird and wonderful lands at the top and magic flying chairs. I can't
imagine at that age reading any other author who I would have enjoyed
more. That might make my literary tastes dire, but I'm happy with them! I might have been a very different person without Blyton stories to open up my imagination.
No comments:
Post a Comment